首頁 > 佃農理論(英語原着) > 佃農理論(英語原着) > 

第41章 《佃農理論》英語原著 (35)

第41章 《佃農理論》英語原著 (35)

Everytransactioninvolvesacontract.Thetransactionsconductedinthemarketplaceentailoutrightorpartialtransfersofpropertyrightsamongindividualcontractingparties.Thesetransfersmaybenegotiatedthroughmanydifferentcontractualarrangements.

Forgenerationseconomistsandlandtenurewritershavesoughttoranktherelativeefficiencyofresourceuseunderdifferentleasingarrangements.Buttheirinquirieswereundertakenwithoutexplicitreferencetothepropertyrightconstraintinvolved.Andinmanyinstances,thecharacteristicsofvariousleasecontractshadnotbeencarefullyexamined.Differentcontractualarrangementsdonotimplydifferentefficienciesofresourceallocationaslongaspropertyrightsareexclusiveandtransferable.Thecharacteristicsofleasecontractspresentedabovealsoconfirmthisstatement.

InthischapterIhaveasked:Whyaredifferentcontractualarrangementschosenunderthesamesystemofprivatepropertyrights?ToanswerthisquestionIhaveintroducedtransactioncostsandrisks.Theattempttoformulateachoice-theoreticapproachtoexplaintheobservedcontractualbehaviorinagri-culturehasperhapsraisedmorequestionsthanithasanswered.AndIhavebeenunabletopiecetogetherfragmentsofanalysisintoaformaltheory:theproblemsinthetheoryofchoiceinvolvingtransactioncostsandrisksarestillformidable.

Althoughthepresenceoftransactioncostsorrisksmayresultindifferentintensitiesofresourceuse,aswasnotedearlierinthischapter,availabledatadonotrevealnotabledifferencesinfarmingintensitiesforvariousleasingarrangementsunderprivatepropertyrights.[1]Thereasoningisasfollows.Themainformsoftenurearrangementsconsideredthusfarincludeownercultivation,wagecontracts,fixedrents,andsharecontracts.Forthesearrangements,economictheoryimpliesatendencytowardthesamesetofmarginalequalitiesofresourceuseeveniftransactioncostsexist.Toobtainanotabletendencytowardmarginalinequalities,transactioncostswouldhavetobesohighastoyield,forexample,thechoiceofacontractwithalump-sumchargeandwithoutquantifyingandpricingresourceunits.Lump-sumcontracts,however,havenotbeenimportantinAsianagricultureandcan,therefore,beignored.Instead,theeffectsoftransactioncostsandrisksarerevealedmainlyintheobservedchoiceofcontractualarrangementsand,lessnotably,theriskpremiumsdistributedamongthecontractingparties.

AmongsomerelatedproblemsthatIhaveexplicitlyavoided,thefollowingaresignificant.First,withrespecttoriskaversion,amoregeneralanalysiswouldincludeallriskychoices,notcontractualchoicealone.Theanalysiswouldbelessdifficultiftransactioncostswerenotinvolved.Second,withrespecttotransactioncosts,amoregeneralanalysiswouldderivesomespecificandwell-behavedcostfunctionoftransactions.Thisstepisessentialtothedevelopmentofamodelofgeneralequilibriumincludingtransactioncosts.

StillotherproblemsIhaveavoidedimplicitly.Inparticular,someleveloflawenforcementbylegalauthoritiesistakenforgranted.Onemaywellask:Whatwillhappentothechoiceofcontractsifthegovernmentchangesitsenforcementefforts?TowhatextentwilltheseeffortsbeconsistentwiththeParetocondition?Whatsetoflegalinstitutionsisconsistentwiththeoperationofthemarketplace?Withthesequestionsunanswered,theconditionsdefiningefficiencywithtransactioncostsarenotallclear.Letmeexplain.

Inproduction,costminimizationrequiresnotonlythefulfillmentofthefamiliarsetofmarginalequalities,butalsothechoiceofthelowest-costproductionmethodavailable.Intransactions,onerelevantconsiderationisthecostofalternativecontractualarrangements,whichIhavediscussedatsomelength.Onemightthinkthat,asacostconstraint,efficiencywillbeattainedwhen,otherthingsequal,thesetofarrangementswiththelowesttransactioncostischosen.Buttransactioncostsalsodependonalternativelegalarrangements.Forexample,thevaryingeffectivenessoflawenforcement,orthevaryingcorruptibilityofcourts,willaffectthecostsoftransactionsinthemarketplace.Giventheexistinglegalinstitutions,Ihaveattemptedtoexplaintheobservedcontractualarrangements.ButinsofarasIhaveignoredthechoiceanddevelopmentofthelegalinstitutions,theParetoconditionwithtransactioncostsisambiguous.

Ihavealsonotexploredthecontractualbehaviorassociatedwithdifferentpropertyrightconstraints.Variousrestrictionsonthetransferofpropertyrights,orvariousmethodsofattenuatingtherightofaresourceownertoobtaininefromhisresource,willaffecttheleasingarrangementsaswellasresourceallocation.IntheremainingchaptersIanalyzeoneimportantconstraint,namely,thelegallimitationonthelandowner'srentalinetoamaximumpercentageoftheannualyield.

[1].Oneexceptionisthatwefindthathousingassetsintenantfarmsweregenerallyoflowervaluethaninownerfarms(NationalGovernment,StatisticalAnalysis,pp.100-1).Itmaybebecausehousingisalsoaconsumptionitemandtenantsweretypicallypoorer.

5.TransferEffectsofRentalShareRestriction:HypothesisandEvidenceofOffsettingContractualRearrangements

< 上一章 目錄 下一章 >